![]() |
Wokingham Art Society Roger Dellar demonstrations |
Home | Latest News Messages | Events and Info | Demo Archive | Annual Exhibition | Gallery | Contacts |
See more of his work at www.rogerdellar.com or visit the Mall Gallery.
Pub, Gouache Sept 2009 |
Henley, Oils March 2012 |
Piccadilly, Oils Jan 2015 |
Top of page | Landscape, Oils April 2016 |
Conversation, Oils April 2017 |
London, Oils Jan 2018 |
Roger
Dellar demo: 16 January 2018 Oils London Scene" |
|
Based on past experience, we gave Roger an enthusiastic welcome. He
had brought a few London street photos (taped over to make them square). He
waved them at us and we chose one by general muttering. As in previous years he
had a piece of light grey primed SBS (smooth both sides) hardboard, about 20"
square on his easel. He was using a limited palette of Winsor & Newton Winton Oils (good value for money) which he thinned with white spirit. First the drawing. No pencil, just a small round brush and some very dark brown oil paint, well thinned. With these he gradually established the general positions of the main features: sky, buildings, busses, lamp-posts and kerbs. Many lines were drawn several times so that their positions could be adjusted to get the best effect |
![]() |
![]() |
It all looked rather a mess but, with the photo alongside, you
could see everything important was there. The composition had been established.
Decisions had been made (perhaps a bit tentatively) about which lamp posts to
include, how much a kerb needed to be moved away from the bottom, how far the
distant trees and buildings went into the sky (leaving quite a lot less sky
than in the photo). One or two prominent verticals and horizontals were
adjusted with the "Golden Section" in mind: nearly 0.62 strictly, but 5/8
(0.625) or even 2/3 (0.67) are near enough in practice. Roger was repeatedly checking the relationships between lines or corners (angles and distances) including a temporary red dot for the street's vanishing point. When he was happy that he knew what went where it was time to start putting colour in. |
Roger moved to a bigger brush to start blocking in the colour. A
patch of distant purple. More red and green in the middle distance. Even more
red and some grey towards the foreground. One red London bus was in shadow and
started out very dark - a sort of reddish sepia. The other, sunlit, was more
vivid. Some very crude darker marks established some of the figures crossing
the road and, of course the shadows under the vehicles. Most of the old drawing
lines disappeared under the new paint. He didn't want the distant tree to be be split centrally by the foreground lamp post but he did want it clear that the tree was behind the post, making sure that there was no change in hue or tone from one side to the other. The road surface and the pavement were painted with the same tone but the nearer pavement was a much warmer colour (like yellow ochre). |
![]() |
![]() |
After introducing a bit of blue into gable ends and smoothing out
some edges with a finger, Roger started on the sky. Using a palette knife he
spread some white, then yellow and finally blue (darker at the top). This order
is important: if you put the yellow over the blue you're more likely to get
green. Again, be careful that the sky is consistent on both sides of the
foreground lamp post. The next gadget Roger produced was a clay colour shaper (from Jackson's). This worked wonders. The paint was all still soft so it could be taken right back to the original primed board. The shaper draws fine "white" marks or lines: highlights, edges, the outlines of the pedestrians (don't paint arms and legs). This led us into the last 30 minutes of the demo. Details. Countless tiny marks everywhere. Pale yellow for heads and shoulders of people. Negative spaces defining figures and vehicles (he talked of finding people, not painting them). |
Marks hinting at windows and architecture. Making sure that shadows
connect things. A sudden decision to warm up the road surface, reducing the
contrast with the pavement. A rigger was needed for some of the finer lines.
One or two posts and vehicles were too big: he reduced them by extending the
background. Some changes were made in the sky. Edges were never long continuous
lines - always broken or of variable width. Asked about finishing and varnishing he said he does use Robersons retouching varnish. If you want to do final additional work a very thin coat of varnish stops you worrying about having to paint fat over lean. Chalk is useful for trying changes out: it can be painted over or wiped off. Finally he signed it with the shaper and clipped it into what looked like the same old frame he used before. Doesn't a frame make a difference!. More enthusiastic applause. |
![]() |
So ended another excellent evening.
Roger said he might well spend another 3/4 hour on this one, tidying up and perhaps even adding an extra figure running to cross. ![]() |
Pub, Gouache Sept 2009 |
Henley, Oils March 2012 |
Piccadilly, Oils Jan 2015 |
Top of page | Landscape, Oils April 2016 |
Conversation, Oils April 2017 |
London, Oils Jan 2018 |
Roger Dellar demo: 18 April 2017 Oils Conversation at Horsefair" |
|
Roger had been asked to paint something that gave the
impression of a conversation. What better, he thought, than the muttered
exchanges you can see at the Smithfield Horse Fair in Dublin? He showed us a couple of photos he might paint from and we chose one of them by show of hands. Roger seems to have taken a liking to a square format, using SMS (Smooth Both Sides) board, primed and tinted, this time, with a light grey. As usual, there was no sign of any pencil work. He had already squeezed out liberal amounts of the oil colours he wanted around the edge of his palette and mixed a sort of sepia colour with a palette knife. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
With a smallish round brush Roger started making
marks. They looked almost random but, despite that, they were in fact
indicating (very roughly at first) the positions of the people, horses and
buildings. The brush jumped from one side to the other, a slash there, another
there, another parallel one to move an earlier mark over a bit. Doing this, he
could add extra people or move things about for composition's sake. "Nothing is
anywhere near finished yet" Many of the Roger's marks filled negative spaces. They help no end in guiding the eye round the picture - making sure things align properly. He always tends to make dark areas too big, knowing that he can always cut into them later with lighter colour as he refines the shapes. |
Before putting any colour on he mixed the main ones he
would need, although he was continually re-mixing as the painting progressed
(always with a knife) Corners can be a problem so he fills them with something, even if it's just a splodge of colour, to round them off The cobbled surface introduced obvious perspective lines. Roger modified them a bit: he drew lines to a vanishing point that coincided with one of the heads in the main group of people. Already, he had reduced his brush size, started moving paint around a bit with a shaper and introduced a rag to remove paint or spread it around a bit. |
![]() |
![]() |
Although the work was still very loose, Roger said it
was important to put in centre-lines and eye-lines correctly, so you could see
how people were balanced and where they were looking. As you paint you should
think of the painting as a whole. It will build up gradually, most things being
understated, so the viewer is left with something to think about. Even before he needed it for finer detail, highlights on edges and modelling of some surfaces, Roger started using a rigger. As always, his brush kept flitting about the canvas, making very quick short dabs. Not all of these were exactly right but you soon learn to make use of happy accidents. |
When he came to do the cobbles he abandoned his
brushes and started painting with a square-ended knife. Roger went back into the faces, this time re-defining their shape and direction by putting shadows in, strictly in accordance with hairlines, cheekbones etc. Finally, to check the composition, he 3 times turned the board by 90 degrees, each time seeing something that needed adjustment: in tone, hue or even position. He was not sure how much more he would do. While it is still wet he will sign it with a shaper. When it has dried enough (perhaps 36 hours) he may go back in with chalk or even re-paint some bits. |
![]() |
Naturally I found myself noting a few of his snippets of
advice.![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
So ended yet another inspiring evening.
Roger makes it look so easy but you never really know what is going on in the back of his mind or how much of the final work he was visualizing from the start. Thanks again, Roger. ![]() |
Pub, Gouache Sept 2009 |
Henley, Oils March 2012 |
Piccadilly, Oils Jan 2015 |
Top of page | Landscape, Oils April 2016 |
Conversation, Oils April 2017 |
London, Oils Jan 2018 |
Roger Dellar demo: 19 April 2016 Oils Rural Landscape" |
|
Roger has officially retired but this just means is that he can
afford to indulge himself in getting away from too-figurative painting and
facing challenges outside his comfort zone. Tonight he was working on a square
of SBS board about 20" across. He primes with "three and a half coats" of
acrylic gesso. The half coat is a little left-over neutral acrylic paint mixed
in to give a light but not dead-white finish. He has taken to square boards as part of getting more abstract - an abstract should, perhaps, look as well-composed whichever way up you look at it. He does several little "fact-finding sketches" until he is happy with the composition. He may cringe at the idea of gridding up a picture against a photo, but not against a sketch you have produced yourself. |
![]() Monochrome sketch |
![]() He began drawing with Paynes Grey with quite a big brush. Work big. Look for negative shapes. Gradually build up the darks. Think of the atmosphere/lighting. Try turning the picture a quarter or half turn to see if anything looks wrong - if it does, one of the advantages of oils is that you can wipe it out with a rag. The board soon was half-covered with the Paynes Grey. Roger then started going back into the lights with alkyd white. He kept picking up small amounts of it from the palette and it mixed over the still-wet grey to make a whole range of shades. |
|
![]() First marks |
![]() Rotate it? |
![]() Next came colour. Roger mixed a few cool shades but they picked up the Paynes Grey and white from underneath. Everything was done with single brush-strokes, dabbed on quickly all over the board. |
![]() |
![]() During the coffee break Roger produced a palette knife and started a lot of such work, smoothing edges and pushing paint this way and that. This started him enthusing about oils: the way you can paint over them wet or dry (but not when just a surface skin has formed); scratching out with the brush handle; putting it on and taking it off again; even spraying it off the end of a stiff brush if you want a speckled effect. But all the while, with a smaller brush, he was touching in tiny strokes of colour all over the board. |
|
The final picture simply emerges. I
don't think this is a skill that can be taught by words. However abstract or representational you are trying to be you must have in mind at least a general idea of what you are working towards. Roger's ideas had developed as he did his series of sketches and trials but, of course, he couldn't show us these except by doing the painting. Fascinating. Inspiring. Encouraging. Thanks again Roger. End of demo ![]() |
Pub, Gouache Sept 2009 |
Henley, Oils March 2012 |
Piccadilly, Oils Jan 2015 |
Top of page | Landscape, Oils April 2016 |
Conversation, Oils April 2017 |
London, Oils Jan 2018 |
Roger
Dellar demo: 20 January 2015 Oils Urban landscape, Piccadilly" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
He was using a limited range of Winton
(student quality) oils: mostly cobalt blue, alizarin crimson, raw umber,
cadmium yellow and alkyd white (alkyd speeds up the drying). From these he had
already mixed some intermediate colours that he knew he would
need. Roger had decided to work from a photo of Picccadilly. Taxis, distant cars, a jay-walker and a cyclist gave it life and interest. He had prepared a 20" x 24" piece of MDF with 3 coats of acrylic gesso: the first very wet, the second thicker, the third thin again but blue-grey coloured. Using a dark grey and a largish brush he let the scene grow on him - big strokes, multiple attempts (nothing removed, so lines became quite thick), relocation (the jay-walker, for example, was put off-center to get an eye-catching imbalance). |
![]() |
![]() |
Then tone and colour. Roger seems very
rarely to clean his brush. He picks up fresh bright paint and uses it to shift
the previous grey in that direction: yellow for the building, then adding a
little red for a nearer wall, more purple for darker shadows, neutralise this
with a little yellow (and white) for the foreground road, horizontal strokes
gradually getting warmer (more red) to bring it forward, green (resulting in a
very dark, only slightly green colour) for mid-distance foliage. He doesn't concentrate long at anything. If he sees that something needs attention he just makes an ostensibly random mark to remind him - in fact the whole process is one of quick short marks: the edge of a window, sharpening an edge (most likely by defining a negative shape). |
I had imagined that the blue
background was going to be the sky colour but Roger scraped a lovely cream over
it with a knife, overpainting the edge of a building to correct its position
and scumbling the same colour for reflection in the road. It wasn't until quite late on that perspective was mentioned (dot important vanishing points; check that heads are all at eye-level) but it would be foolish to think that Roger had not been conscious of it from the start - you need to know where your eye-line is, otherwise cars, people and taxis will look out of proportion. "Don't forget shadows under cars" Every now and then we would hear "I don't like that" and a patch of wall or road surface would be agitated and touches of a new colour introduced. |
![]() |
![]() |
Soon after the break Roger said "This
is just about done, now" but there still followed 25 minutes of detail.
For much of the time he had been using a medium filbert brush but a smaller round one appeared now. The knife was used once or twice more, to modify the road surface, for example, but mostly it was the small brush and smaller marks. Tiny touches of bright red and cream. Highlights. Reflections off edges. Bright behind (and reflections below) the jay-walker. Hints of road markings. Closer definition and subtle shifting of shapes (almost always by painting the negative spaces behind them). Reinforcing or smudging out existing marks. Potentially, it was a never-ending process. The clock brought this most inspiring demo to an end. Thanks Roger. |
Of course, there had been the usual stream of
asides:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() Again, thanks, Roger, for another super evening. |
![]() |
Pub, Gouache Sept 2009 |
Henley, Oils March 2012 |
Piccadilly, Oils Jan 2015 |
Top of page | Landscape, Oils April 2016 |
Conversation, Oils April 2017 |
London, Oils Jan 2018 |
Roger
Dellar demo: 20 March 2012 Water Soluble oils Henley" |
|||
Before the demo even started, Roger was at work : laying out his palette and pulling colours down into the working area with a palette knife. Premixing the initial colours gives you an impression of how they will go together. | Apparently, artists are not allowed to set up their easels at the Henley regatta but they are given a day to gather photographic and other information. The photo we chose was one of Roger's, one not previously used as a source. | ||
![]() |
![]() |
||
We already knew much of Roger's background and how he enjoys
working out new paintings for each demo (see below), so I'll not repeat
it. Tonight he used a palette of 10 or 12 mostly watersoluble oils on a 16" x 20" Loxley canvas (with an extra coat of acrylic primer). His approach to painting is consistent. He does no pencil drawing on the canvas, preferring to get the composition right by putting down big patches of colour. Composition is vital. When he does use a photo it is only as a starting point. "What's the point of copying it?" Implicitly, the photographer has already done some of the work but the artist will always want to adjust things. |
![]() The lighting was difficult. These colours may be a little too bright. |
||
![]() |
Roger's big patches of thin blues, browns and greens let him see
how the work will look without it getting cluttered with detail. He has changed
the skyline, added more grass, given more prominence to the man on the right
(the curved shape guides the eye back into the picture), started to move the
two girls slightly to the side and re-structured the group on the left. It is a
process of trial and error (although, Roger certainly had less errors than I
would have had). The line of chairs implies an horizon and vanishing point but he only marked it in in response to a question. This led to a short lesson on perspective. Heads are not always at horizon level - ones below the painter's eye level come up towards the horizon as they get further away, and vice versa. Be careful to put the head over the load-bearing foot unless you want to imply movement. |
||
It was at about this point that Roger did the small amount of
drawing of the evening, with a smaller round brush, held well back from the
ferrule. But very soon afterwards he took up a short flat (a bright) to
introduce cool, more distant, and warm whites. From then on it was a continuing process of refinement: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() He did not expect to have to do much more on this painting apart, perhaps, from a little such edge-softening. |
||
Having given us another wonderful
evening, and inspired us to invite him back for another demo before too long,
Roger shared his current excitement with us: he hopes to get a commission from
one of the Oxford Colleges to do an 8ft x 6ft painting of the Pope's visit,
including a recognisable Pope, cardinals and others - some hundred in all. Good
luck, Roger.
|
Pub, Gouache Sept 2009 |
Henley, Oils March 2012 |
Piccadilly, Oils Jan 2015 |
Top of page | Landscape, Oils April 2016 |
Conversation, Oils April 2017 |
London, Oils Jan 2018 |
Roger
Dellar demo: 15 September 2009 Gouache The Rising Sun, Smithfield" |
|
The last time Roger came to Wokingham, he
had forgotten his brushes! So he painted with the washing-up brush from the
church kitchen and produced a wonderful picture! This time, he had all his
materials to hand and talked as he began to paint a scene from a photo taken
inside The Rising Sun pub in Smithfield. Since starting to paint in oils, acrylic and gouache, Roger has been accepted as a member of the Royal Institute of Painters in Watercolour (RI), the Pastel Society (PS) and the Royal Institute of Oil Painters (ROI), amongst other organisations. He found that traditional watercolour was rather restrictive for his loose style. As he said this, he scumbled with a bristle brush, various earth colours, from yellow ochre to burnt umber, across a piece of watercolour paper, leaving gaps where the lightest lights would be. |
|
![]() |
The paper had already been prepared with acrylic
gesso. All Rogers paints for this demonstration were gouache, except a
watercolour ultramarine blue. Because of the chalk binder, the gouache blues
looked too matt. Its possible to mix any and all of the water-based paint
media together. Roger used a very limited palette of complementary colours yellows and browns with pale blues and small splashes of red. Where any particular colour dominated in one area, he echoed the colour around appropriate points within the picture to give it more cohesion. Gouache dries very quickly, but it can be moved around at any time with a wet brush to give half tones and soft edges. The picture itself was of a dark interior, with several people standing at the pub bar and within the area. Light was coming from a big window at the far end of the room, as well as from several ceiling lights. Roger dealt with the window light with pale blue and the ceiling lights with lemon yellow and white, both of which cast many shadows in the floor and from pillars and panels around the walls. The angles of the rooms fittings gave a great sense of space within the room and these were highlighted with the blues and yellows against the dark browns. Every colour was reflected in the floor. |
Once the content of the painting had been
placed, Roger swapped to a small brush to draw more detail on the figures and
the bar area, just dabbing colour here and there, so that nothing was precise
and so that many lost & found areas remained. By darkening the
foreground the pub floor the eye was taken to the light window
and the figures standing in front of it. As he painted, many figures emerged
from the scumbling, a bruiser propping up the bar, a couple of
talking suits with pints, a man in the near corner sitting at a
table. By just defining an ear, a complete body would come together! A few dabs here and there of white with a spot of lemon yellow produced the final highlights on the bar pumps, the glasses and the people, turning the completed painting into a wonderful, impressionistic work of art. If you werent there, you missed a treat! However, you can see Rogers work at http://www.rogerdellar.com/. He also appears on the Royal Institute of Oil Painters website, http://www.theroi.co.uk/. Keep a lookout for a forthcoming ROI workshop at the Mall Galleries in October, where the famous Italian chef, Antonio Carlucci, will be modelling for professional and amateur artists. Roger will be amongst them. |
![]() The Rising Sun, Smithfield |
Madeline Hawes |
Pub, Gouache Sept 2009 |
Henley, Oils March 2012 |
Piccadilly, Oils Jan 2015 |
Top of page | Landscape, Oils April 2016 |
Conversation, Oils April 2017 |
London, Oils Jan 2018 |
All images on this website are the copyright of either the Wokingham Art Society or the individual artists |